Robotic Assisted Redo Rectopexy and Low Anterior Resection

Video Type: CVideo
  • 2-5 min videos of a particular surgery or technique. These again show major events in the surgery
  • Clearly annotated and narration is a must in these videos
  • These have clear but concise abstracts are not able to be indexed in PubMed
  • Distributed in newsletters, featured on our website and social media
  • Peer reviewed

Author: Michelle DeLeon, MD
Specialties: General Surgery, Robotic Surgery
Schools: Rutgers- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Basic Info

Contributors: Craig Rezac, MD

Low anterior resection and rectopexy is the optimal treatment for well functioning patients with rectal prolapse. Reoperations for rectal prolapse may be challenging due to significant adhesions. Use of the robot for low anterior resection and rectopexy is safe, feasible and may be more useful than laparoscopy especially in challenging cases.




Robotic assisted redo rectopexy and low anterior resection.

IMA ligation and sigmoidectomy was performed to eliminate the redundancy in the left colon that contributed to the prolapse. Resection with rectopexy has the lowest recurrence rate for prolapse. Rectopexy done before the anastomosis ensures a more adequate suspension of the posterior pelvic floor. If the anastomoses is done first it covers the sacral promontory making the rectopexy more difficult to do. We have not had tearing of sutures.


rectal prolapse




Dorsal lithotomy position, preoperative cystoscopy and bilateral ureteral stents, robot docked to the left of the patient

Preoperative Workup

Physical exam revealing rectal prolapse, colonoscopy

Anatomy and Landmarks

peritoneal reflection, sacral promontory, white line of Toldt


The main advantages of the robotic system for rectal prolapse are improved magnification and picture quality, decreased surgeon fatigue, easier access to the pelvis with articulating instruments and significantly easier suturing. The main disadvantages include increased cost and operative time.


Disclosure of Conflicts



0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply