Open Posterior Graft Laryngoplasty

Video Type: CVideo
  • 2-5 min videos of a particular surgery or technique. These again show major events in the surgery
  • Clearly annotated and narration is a must in these videos
  • These have clear but concise abstracts are not able to be indexed in PubMed
  • Distributed in newsletters, featured on our website and social media
  • Peer reviewed

Author: Diego Preciado
Published:
Specialties: Otolaryngology
Schools: Children's National Medical Center
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...
Basic Info

This video highlights the key points of successful open posterior costochondral laryngoplasty.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17797/i6v1c8ghhg

Advanced

Procedure

posterior costochondral graft laryngoplasty

Indications

posterior glottic stenosis;
severe subglottic stenosis;
bilateral vocal cord paralysis

Contraindications

severe active airway inflammation or infection

Instrumentation

Setup

endoscopic microlaryngoscopy equipment; 90 degree table turn; intraoperative tracheotomy airway

Preoperative Workup

direct laryngoscopy and bronchscopy; rule out severe reflux or eosinophilic esophagitis; rule out active pulmonary disease

Anatomy and Landmarks

anterior larynx split from lower third of thyroid cartilage through the first/second tracheal ring in the midline. The anterior commissure is not divided. The cricothyroid muscles are left intact.
The graft is carved to fit the posterior split with a precise match. The width of the luminal face of the graft can vary from 3-6 mm. It is not necessary to suture the graft into place. After positioning the graft, patients are nasotracheally intubated for 7-10 days in cases of a single-stage approach or a suprastomal stent is positioned for 10-21 days in cases of a double-stage approach.

Advantages/Disadvantages

Advantages: precise positioning of graft. Tracheotomy can be avoided.
Disadvantages: Open approach. Must be careful to not violate the anterior commissure.

Complications/Risks

Short-term: Graft displacement/migration
Long-term: Arytenoid prolapse/subluxation

Disclosure of Conflicts

Short-term: Graft displacement/migration
Long-term: Arytenoid prolapse/subluxation

Acknowledgements

none

References

1: Rutter MJ, Cotton RT. The use of posterior cricoid grafting in managing
isolated posterior glottic stenosis in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jun;130(6):737-9. PubMed PMID: 15210555.

2: Maresh A, Preciado DA, O'Connell AP, Zalzal GH. A comparative analysis of open surgery vs endoscopic balloon dilation for pediatric subglottic stenosis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct;140(10):901-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1742. PubMed PMID: 25170960.

3: Preciado D. A randomized study of suprastomal stents in laryngotracheoplasty surgery for grade III subglottic stenosis in children. Laryngoscope. 2014
Jan;124(1):207-13. doi: 10.1002/lary.24141. Epub 2013 May 13. PubMed PMID: 23670810.

Share
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply