Endoscopic Ampullectomy

Video Type: CVideo
  • 2-5 min videos of a particular surgery or technique. These again show major events in the surgery
  • Clearly annotated and narration is a must in these videos
  • These have clear but concise abstracts are not able to be indexed in PubMed
  • Distributed in newsletters, featured on our website and social media
  • Peer reviewed

Author: Gregory Cote
Published:
Specialties: Endoscopy, General Surgery
Schools:
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...
Basic Info

Contributor: Darin L. Dufault

This video illustrates two cases of ampullary adenoma treated with endoscopic papillectomy (a.k.a.

endoscopic ampullectomy in many manuscripts). Along with local surgical ampullectomy and

pancreaticoduodenectomy, endoscopic papillectomy is an established treatment option for benign

lesions of the ampulla of Vater. For the majority of benign ampullary lesions, complete endoscopic

resection of ampullary lesions is usually feasible. Limitations to endoscopic therapy include deep

extension into the bile or pancreatic duct, > 50% lateral extension along the duodenal wall, and

carcinomatous transformation. In general, endoscopic resection should be considered equivalent to

local surgical ampullectomy in terms of its depth of dissection.

In the first case, the patient was noted to have adenomatous appearing change of the ampulla

on endoscopy. An electrocautery snare is used to remove the entire papilla. When technically feasible,

cholangiopancreatography should precede tissue resection to evaluate for intraductal extension and

identify the orifices for post-resection therapy. Since this was unsuccessful prior to resection, the

pancreatic duct is then cannulated and a pancreatogram is obtained. A pancreatic duct stent is then

placed after pancreatic sphincterotomy to minimize the risk of post-ampullectomy and ERCP

pancreatitis, and to prevent stenosis of the pancreatic orifice long-term. Then, a cholangiogram is

performed, confirming no intraductal extension and to facilitate a biliary sphincterotomy.

The second case is a patient referred for further evaluation of cholestatic liver function tests and

a dilated bile duct. Endoscopically, they were noted to have a protuberant papilla. Endoscopic

ultrasound (EUS) showed a mass between the bile and pancreatic ducts and within the ampulla of Vater,

along with a significantly dilated bile duct. The mass did not invade the duodenal wall, as showed by

preservation of the muscularis propria. In cases where malignancy is not suspected and in smaller

lesions, EUS may not be required. Prior to papillectomy, the pancreatic duct was cannulated and

methylene blue injected into the duct to allow easier identification of the duct following papillectomy.

The mass was also able to be seen on cholangiogram (green circle). It is preferred to remove the papilla

en bloc, as shown in case one, although this is not always possible. There was a small amount of

residual tissue at the core of the lesion that was further resected in piecemeal fashion using a hot snare

with blended cut and coagulation current. Biliary and pancreatic stents were then placed to minimize

the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis, delayed post-ampullectomy bleeding, and orifice stenosis. These

stents are typically removed after 1-2 months, at which time the resection site may be surveyed for

residual adenomatous tissue. Last, a small amount of residual abnormal appearing tissue was ablated

using APC.

Editor Recruited By: Jeffrey Matthews, MD

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17797/ju7gthra0v

Advanced

Procedure

ERCP with endoscopic ampullectomy

Indications

symptomatic or pre-malignant lesions of the Ampulla of Vater

Contraindications

Presence of malignancy in the lesion, lesion with significant ingrowth into the bile and/or pancreatic duct

Instrumentation

Setup

side-viewing duodenoscope with patient in prone position under general anesthesia

Preoperative Workup

Biopsies should be obtained prior to resection

Anatomy and Landmarks

Ampulla of Vater

Advantages/Disadvantages

Advantages: endoscopic intervention that does not require entering the peritoneum
Disadvantages: not able to remove lesions extending up the ducts >1cm (approximately)

Complications/Risks

bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis, biliary and/or pancreatic orifice stenosis

Disclosure of Conflicts

Acknowledgements

References

Share
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply